Kenya: Meta can be sued in Kenya for role in Ethiopia conflict
Summary
Date Reported: 3 Apr 2025
Location: Kenya
Companies
Meta (formerly Facebook) - PlatformAffected
Total individuals affected: Number unknown
Human rights group: ( Number unknown - Kenya - Sector unknown , Gender not reported ) , Public: ( Number unknown - Ethiopia - Sector unknown , Gender not reported )Response
Response sought: No
Source type: NGO
"Kenya: Meta can be sued in Kenya for role in Ethiopia conflict", 3 April 2025.
In response to the High Court ruling that it has jurisdiction to hear and consider the merits of the case, in which Meta is accused of promoting content that led to ethnic violence and killings in Ethiopia from 2020 to 2022, Mandi Mudarikwa, Head of Strategic Litigation at Amnesty International, said:
“Today’s ruling is a positive step towards holding big tech companies accountable for contributing to human rights abuses. It paves the way for justice and serves notice to big tech platforms that the era of impunity is over...
“This ruling offers hope that marginalized groups can access justice no matter where they are in the world. The idea of looking at countries outside the US and Europe as mere markets where profits can be made in the absence of accountability must be challenged...
The case filed against Meta raises substantial questions of law regarding Facebook’s use of algorithms and its impact on rights protected by Kenya’s Bill of Rights and broadly in international and human rights law. Since Courts in Kenya are vested with jurisdiction to determine whether a right has been violated and to interpret the constitution among other things, the Court confirmed that it had jurisdiction to hear the matter on this basis. The Court went on to say that, as stipulated by section 165 of the Constitution of Kenya, such cases that raise substantial issues of law must be heard by an uneven number of judges therefore the matter has now been sent to the Chief Justice for empanelment or the appointment of the judges to hear the matter. After the Court handed down its decision, Meta’s legal representatives asked for the Court’s permission to appeal and continue to seek dismissal of the petition...
The petitioners argue that the Facebook platform’s algorithms amplified inciteful, hateful and dangerous content which contributed to significant human rights violations.
Meta challenged the jurisdiction of Kenyan courts, arguing that their terms of service restrict claims against them to US courts.
Kenyan courts have previously allowed trials in cases where former Facebook content moderators sued Meta for unlawful dismissal...