abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Эта страница недоступна на Русский и отображается на English

Материал доступен на следующих языках: English, 日本語

История

30 Июн 2023

China: Battery and bus manufacturers accused of connection to forced labor practices

Shutterstock

Two reports by Globalworks Lund AB explore forced labor risks in the supply chains of a total of eight battery manufacturing companies and an electric bus manufacturer, highlighting industry-wide human rights concerns in China. The reports find BYD and EVE Energy performs business operations at sites in Xinjiang and Tibet, where the risk of repression and state-imposed forced labour is very high. BYD, CATL, Durapower, Samsung, LG Chem, and Panasonic may be linked to forced labour in Xinjiang via their joint-venture partners, shareholders, through products, operations or services. At Yutong Bus, forced labour risks are mainly linked to a supplier contract with CATL providing batteries for all of the companies electric buses at least until 2032.

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited all companies named in the two reports to respond. The responses from BYD, EVE Energy and Panasonic can be found below. CATL, Durapower, LG Chem, Samsung, SK Innovation and Yutong Bus did not respond.

Ответы компании

Contemporary Amperex Technology (CATL)

Нет ответа

Durapower

Нет ответа

LG Chem

Нет ответа

Samsung Electronics

Нет ответа

SK Innovation

Нет ответа

Yutong

Нет ответа

Panasonic Holdings Corp Смотреть ответ

Хронология