abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

29 Apr 2024

Author:
Isatou Ndure, Just Style

UK: H&M & Boohoo to be questioned by Environmental Audit Committee over steps taken to reduce environmental impacts

"H&M, Boohoo to face UK probe over fast fashion footprint", 29 April 2024

The sustainability of major fashion retailers H&M and Boohoo will come under scrutiny from UK lawmakers on 1 May, when the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) will revisit its landmark 2019 inquiry into the fashion industry in a follow-up evidence session...

While several leading fashion brands have declined to give evidence in person, representatives from H&M and Boohoo are among those set to face questioning from EAC MPs.

The committee is expected to grill the retailers on the concrete steps each have taken to reduce their environmental impacts since the 2019 “Fixing fashion: clothing consumption and sustainability” report.

During Wednesday’s session MPs are likely to probe head of public affairs at H&M Marcus Hartmann and Boohoo’s responsible sourcing director on issues including overproduction, textile waste and their use of sustainable materials...

H&M confirmed to Just Style that it would be attending the hearing but did not supply any further information.

A Boohoo spokesperson said: “We were very happy to accept the Committee’s invitation to appear at this session and provide an update on these important issues.”...

The “Fixing Fashion” report called for urgent government action to “end the era of throwaway fashion” through measures like an Extended Producer Responsibility scheme to make brands responsible for their waste. However, progress has been disappointingly slow according to the Committee.

The government rejected most of the committee’s recommendations from the report’s first enquiry in 2018...

However, the government identified textile waste as a priority area to address in its Resources and Waste Strategy...

The report came off the back of EAC’s list of recommendations to the UK government urging it to introduce legislation to require fashion brands and retailers to perform due diligence checks across their supply chains, in a bid to tackle labour abuses and take more responsibility for the environmental impact of their businesses.

This too was rejected by the UK government, a decision that EAC labelled as “not good enough” and “out of step with the public.”

The EAC had requested to ban the incineration or landfilling of unsold stock and impose penny levies on garment producers. However, instead of implementing these requests, the Ministers reviewed the Modern Slavery Act 2015 to evaluate its effectiveness.

They also said they would continue to support the industry through the Sustainable Clothing Action Plan, a voluntary agreement coordinated by the Waste and Resources Action Programme, which sets targets to reduce carbon emissions, water, and waste.

The EAC was unsatisfied with the government’s response...